pleasing your readers

In the article I submitted to JCMC a few months ago, I integrated the theoretical discussion in the actual analysis. One of the reviewers suggestsed to restructure and separate the theory and the analysis. In my article about mediated subjectivites, a lengthier theoretical discussion precedes the analysis. The editor at Gyldendal, she's sharp and very efficient, suggest to integrate them. It can sure be difficult to satisfy readers or what?

Work all of a sudden piled up. A lot of it at once, isn't that just typical? I'm not complaining, luckily I love what I do.